Latin America Turns Right as Crime and Sanctions Reshape Politics

Latin America has moved to the right. Not in an election, not in a country, not as a passing mood. The political map of the region has been reordered. Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Peru, Colombia, Honduras, El Salvador, Ecuador, and the Dominican Republic are now governed by right-wing, center-right, or security-first governments broadly aligned with Washington's new strategic posture.

Only Mexico, Brazil, Uruguay and a handful of other countries remain, for now, outside this broader shift. Cuba and Nicaragua remain closed authoritarian cases. Venezuela, after the breakdown of the old Chavista order, now stands as the clearest warning of what happens when leftist regimes lose both legitimacy and protection.

That is the new hemisphere. The pink tide has receded. In its place is a tougher, more security-driven law. And the latest evidence is not just that the right is winning. That's why he's winning.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATOR BACKS BOLIVIA'S STATE OF EMERGENCY AS FORMER LEFTIST LEADER'S LOYALS FRACTURE NATION

The decisive shift came after the United States moved from pressure to force in the strategic environment of Latin America and then expanded that pressure through Cuba and the Iran war. Washington demonstrated that hostile regimes could be crushed, destabilized, or eliminated; that fuel, sanctions and military influence could be used together; and that the hemisphere would now be treated less as a diplomatic afterthought and more as a security perimeter.

That changed the political calculus across the region.

This was not a single event. It was a sequence. The fall of Maduro changed the psychological ceiling of what Washington would do. Cuba's fuel crisis turned leftist shortages into a living warning. The war with Iran pushed energy prices, shipping risk and domestic fuel politics to the center of elections from Chile to Colombia. Together, these shocks rewrote the incentives for leaders, voters, business elites, and security forces.

TRUMP ADMIN ANNOUNCES EXPANSION OF VISA RESTRICTION POLICY IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE

A voter can forgive weak growth for a while. He does not easily forgive a State that cannot protect his family, his store, his movements, his border or his future. Once people come to the conclusion that the state is absent, weak, or captured, they stop voting for ideals and start voting for force.

That is the true story of the new Latin American right. It is not a conventional conservative wave. It is a rebellion against vulnerability.

El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele joined the annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, warning attendees that members of violent gangs in his country have a documented history of worshiping Satan. (Alex Peña/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The new right understands this better than the old right. He doesn't campaign just about markets, tax cuts and anti-socialism. He campaigns on punishment. He says the state has been humiliated by gangs, cartels, corrupt elites, failed parties and weak executives, and that it must become visible again.

TRUMP SAYS COLOMBIA'S 'THE TIGER' WILL BE A 'GREAT PRESIDENT' AS SOCIALIST OPPONENT LAUNCHES LEGAL CHALLENGE

Not through another reform committee. Through force.

That is why Bukele-style politics has become the hemisphere's most important export product. Bukele did not invent the hardline security policy. He made it modern, visually and electorally overwhelming. Emergency powers, mass arrests, military presence, megaprisons: everything became a spectacle of the State dominating the gangs.

The method is dangerous. The appeal is obvious. In societies exhausted by extortion, violence and impunity, visible strength can be sold as competition. Bukele's true export is not a policy manual. It is a visual grammar of power. He showed that security can become a mark of government and that voters abandoned by institutions can reward the leader who seems willing to break them.

Colombia and Peru show how far that grammar has come. In Colombia, Abelardo de la Espriella's rise was fueled by legislative gridlock, a failed peace policy, rural violence, corruption accusations and the assassination of a leading conservative figure. His appeal was not the nuance. It was cruelty. He seemed like a man willing to act where institutions had stagnated.

But its rise was also accelerated by the regional context. A few months earlier, he was still a political outsider. Washington then demonstrated in the region that anti-American regimes could be pushed hard, that Maduro was no longer protected, and that Latin America would now be within a more aggressive US security framework. De la Espriella's hardline message, aligned with Trump, fit perfectly into that new order.

In Peru, Keiko Fujimori's victory came in a country discredited by political turmoil, dysfunction, recurring crises, crime and instability. Its advantage was not ideological freshness. It was a familiar brand that prioritized security in a system voters no longer trusted. She wasn't riding a wave of enthusiasm. I was riding a wave of exhaustion. That distinction matters.

Costa Rica's presidential candidate Laura Fernandez of the Pueblo Soberano Party gestures to her supporters during her victory speech after the presidential election results at the Aurola Hotel in San Jose, February 1, 2026. (Marvin Recinos/AFP via Getty Images)

Neither Colombia nor Peru obtained overwhelming results. Both achieved very narrow victories for the right in divided societies that had lost confidence in the old political class. Those results

does not suggest consensus. They suggest an institutional fracture. They suggest that voters sought order because the alternative seemed adrift.

Donald Trump did not create that demand. The crime did it. Weak growth did. Failed institutions did. The exhaustion of the pink tide did.

Trump did something else. It gave the change a geopolitical structure.

Washington no longer treats Latin America as a development challenge or a diplomatic afterthought. It is treating the hemisphere as a safety zone. Cartels, migration, Chinese infrastructure, ports, energy, critical minerals and hostile authoritarian regimes are no longer separate files. They are a struggle for power in America's own neighborhood.

That changes the calculation. Alignment with Washington now indicates access, support, seriousness and protection. It tells investors that a government wants order. He tells security forces that they can count on the support of the United States. He tells voters that his country is not tilting toward Havana, Caracas or Beijing. And after the Iran war, he tells them that energy shocks, shipping disruptions, and strategic instability will be managed by governments close to the center of American power.

Trump's maximum-pressure stance toward hostile regimes makes alignment with Washington more valuable and isolation more costly. It also makes the right seem like the only camp with realistic outside support. If you're a governor, a general, a banker, or a voter trying to decide who can protect your country from the next shock, that's important.

For the United States, what is at stake is clear. A Latin America more aligned with the United States could improve counternarcotics cooperation, reduce migratory pressure, complicate Chinese influence, and restore American influence in a region.

Washington neglected it for too long. But a hemisphere of pro-American strongmen is not the same as a hemisphere of strong democratic partners.

There is a difference between rebuilding the State and exercising power. A serious government strengthens the police, courts, prosecutors, prisons, borders and ports. makes law

credible beyond a single leader. It can produce fear. It can even produce temporary order. But he leaves behind weak institutions and a leader too big for the system around him.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

That is the proof of the new Latin American right. He has understood the demand for public order, the collapse of patience with the old left, and the courage of Washington at a time when the United States is once again treating the hemisphere as strategically vital.

Now he has to govern.

CLICK FOR MORE FROM TANVI RATNA