To the editor: The Times reported that the rates proposed by President Trump could threaten the commercial industry of $ 300 billion in the south of California, a sector that supports almost 2 million jobs linked to the port and logistics systems of our region (“Trump tariffs threaten the commercial industry of $ 300 billion in southern California, says the report.” April 22).
This is deeply worrying because these industries are fundamental to the economic health of our region and provide stability for innumerable families. It is especially worrying for recent university graduates like me who enter the workforce at a time of uncertainty. Instead of expanding the opportunity, these policies could reduce work perspectives in multiple sectors.
As a public health student and recent graduate, my perspective is formed by academic training and personal experience. I have studied how economic insecurity can lead to the worsening of mental health results, increased chronic stress and reduction of access to essential services such as medical care. These are realities for many of my classmates, especially those of working and immigrant class history that already face systemic barriers for employment and well -being.
It is also worrying that the loss of employment does not remain limited to an industry. When commerce and logistics receive a success, it is undulating out: local clinics, schools, public transport and real estate markets feel tension. Communities that no longer have resources are often the most affected.
Policy formulators must adopt a more holistic approach, one that considers not only national commercial objectives but also local impacts on economic and public health. Protecting jobs in southern California should not be the second to political position. We need commercial policies that support, not sabotage, the future of our communities.
Nadia Mahida, Garden Grove
