Collaborator: Jimmy Kimmel and the threat that the comedy raises to the autocrats


The abrupt suspension of the night show of the comedian's night Jimmy Kimmel in ABC might seem the slightest of our concerns in the middle of the closure of government agencies, the collapse of Congress' controls on the Executive Power and the bands of ice agents that stop people on the basis of the race or language. But humor matters.

While the media are sometimes known as the fourth state, together with the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the government, few think of the comedy standing as a pillar of democracy. But jokes allow a society to make fun of uncomfortable truths, bridge differences and say what cannot be said otherwise. Humor is a crucial bastion of a free society. To play that role, comedians need the margin of maneuver to embarrass, provoke and take risks, sometimes cross the line on offense.

Following the suspension of Kimmel, it is difficult to imagine that any masonal market humorist mocks that mock satire demands. One of the most powerful ointments for people under stress, and a particular life line during Trump's era, is the ability to laugh at ridiculous or unfathomable. Reducing a curtain on comedy will not only mitigate one of the most precious cultural forms in our country, but will also accelerate the dark turn of US democracy.

With the date prior to the revolutionary, political satire has been a pillar of American culture. The rebel settlers skew the British tax policies, military errors and parliamentary pompositions through plays, songs and cartoons that brought together others with the cause of independence and made the mass mobilization fun. The “rules of Benjamin Franklin in 1773 by which a great empire can be reduced to a small one” used irony to ridicule British politics, undermining authority while avoiding the direct deployment of the hard laws of sedition of the time. The juxtaposition of a cheerful format with a pointed comment has marked the comic tradition of the United States since then, covering literary humorists such as Mark Twain and Edgar Allan Poe, satirical satirical magazines such as Puck and Mad, political cartoons, Vaudeville, Radio Satire, stand-up and the night juggers of varieties of variety 1975, Saturday night “, on Saturday.” “

Although our tradition of the first amendment has mainly protected satire over the years, it has not prevented hard hand politicians from occasionally silenceing their comic critics. When Thomas Nast, known as the father of American political cartoons, assumed the Tweed Chief of New York City and his Tammany Hall political machine in the 1870s, Tweed said: “According to the reports, we stop those damn photos. I don't care much that the documents write about me: my constituents cannot read, but they can do, but they can read, but they can read, but they can read, but you can But Nast maintained a furious rhythm of cartoon, accelerating Tweed's fall due to corruption charges.

The satire of capitalism and authoritarianism of Charlie Chaplin in films, including “Modern Times” and “The Great Dictator”, along with his open policy and his alleged communist ties, drew Surveillance of the FBI. In 1952, his re -entry permission to the United States was revoked, effectively exiles for almost 20 years.

Throughout the world, the autocrats have recognized the power of comedians to pierce preferred narratives, undermine authority and enliven the dissent. Reichskulturkammer, or Culture Chamber of the Nazi regime, strictly censored cabaret and comedy. The artist of Cabaret Werner Finck opened a club in 1929 and dared the members of Gestapo to the audience to write each of his words. Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels ordered the closed place in 1935 and sent Finck and his colleagues to a period of six weeks in a concentration camp. In the Soviet Union, jokes about Joseph Stalin or the Communist Party were treated as serious crimes against the State, which guarantees time in the Gulag.

In the era of international television and social networks, power, and the perceived threat of comedy has only grown. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, built the national height as a satirical television that plays a fictional president. The government of his predecessor, who did everything possible to derail his political opponents, did not see to come to Zelensky; Until it happened, few imagined their jump from the sound stage to the presidential podium. In 2013, the Cairo government issued an arrest warrant for television Bassemem Youssef, known as Jon Stewart of Egypt, for jokes about President Mohamed Morsi and Islam. He was persecuted in exile and has lived in the United States during the last decade.

In an increasingly polarized America, the place of comedy has been attacked from all sides. A decade ago, Jerry Seinfeld said he would no longer show university campuses due to the fierce politically correct political reaction against his jokes. In 2019, the New York Times announced that it would no longer publish political cartoons after apologizing for an anti -Semitic cartoon of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. This year, the dinner of the White House correspondents canceled a planned appearance of the comedian Amber Ruffin, the last of a series of kerfuffles about controversial presenters of that event. The growing cost of reprisals, in the form of offended constituencies, online indignation and direct threats, is making humor too hot to handle.

The public threats issued by the president of the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr, against Kimmel and ABC, based on comments from the comedian who were not incendiary or threatening, marks a strong escalation in the battle against humor. The immediate capitulation of Disney, one of the largest and most venerated corporations in the United States, is a shocking signal of how quickly private and independent institutions are being melted under a heated threat by a vindictive administration. If a comedian as conventional as Jimmy Kimmel is not safe from silencing, it is difficult to imagine who he is.

By helping the public to understand what is happening around them and calculate their fears, comedy is a collective coping mechanism and a catalyst for without restrictions and clear eyes. Autocrats around the world understand this.

Suzanne Nossel is a member of the Facebook Supervision Board and the author of “Dare To Speak: Defending Free Speech for all.”

scroll to top