Bidenomics architect is Kamala's economic adviser


Join Fox News to access this content

Plus, you'll get special access to select articles and other premium content with your account—at no charge!

By entering your email and pressing continue, you agree to Fox News' Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Financial Incentive Notice.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Vice President Kamala Harris would prefer voters not to remember her role in the economic disaster of the past three and a half years. She has distanced herself from President Biden and the agenda that bears his name, “Bidenomics.”

But in this life, we are judged by our actions and the company we keep. The truth is that Harris was the decisive vote in the Senate in favor of the packages that wrecked the budget and increased inflation. One of her closest advisers today, Brian Deese, is the architect of “bidenomics.”

Voters who think Harris would bring a fresh perspective to the White House should think twice. If she is elected, the same old team would be in charge. That means the next four years would be exactly like the last three and a half years.

Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during a visit to Meridian High School in Falls Church, Virginia, on May 20, 2022.
(Jemal Countess/UPI/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Prices have risen more than 20% across the board since Biden and Harris took office. Prices for many household staples have risen even more. Inflation has fallen from its peak of 9.6% in the summer of 2021, but is still well above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

TRUMP HAS A PLAN FOR ECONOMIC PROSPERITY, HARRIS DOES NOT

Democrats and the financial press are proclaiming mission accomplished, but it is a disastrous economic record that has left Americans worse off and resentful. The blame falls squarely on Bidenomics and its promoters, like Harris and Deese.

Bidenomics was the belief that a government spending bonanza could boost the economy after the turmoil caused by a pandemic, lockdowns and supply chain disruptions.

Deese, who served as chair of Biden’s National Economic Council from 2021 to 2023, said this agenda was based on the “unapologetic recognition” that government action was necessary to “correct market failures” and create “strong and inclusive growth.” He contrasted Bidenomics with Reaganomics, saying the Biden-Harris approach had “a more rational understanding of the productive and constructive role that the public sector and public investment can play.”

PHILADELPHIA VOTERS WEIGH IN ON ECONOMY: 'EVERYONE IS IN TROUBLE RIGHT NOW'

The original sin of Bidenomics was the American Rescue Plan, which was signed into law in March 2021. Harris was no mere bystander to this development. She cast the deciding vote in favor of the bill in the Senate. The bill injected a staggering $1.9 trillion into an economy already awash in easy money.

The result of this spending frenzy was predictable: immediate and persistent inflation.

The Biden administration, however, downplayed the damage, calling it temporary, and attempted to deflect blame. In 2021, Deese claimed that “short-term inflationary pressures” were “not the problem.” He later predicted that inflation would “moderate” in 2022.

In fact, inflation hit its highest level in 41 years in 2022 and has yet to return to the 2% annual rate that is considered normal. To this day, Harris boasts that inflation is “below 3%.” You can change the parameters, but you can’t change the facts.

CONSERVATIVE ECONOMISTS HAVE POURED COLD WATER ON HARRIS' NEW SMALL BUSINESS TAX PROPOSAL

Worse, the Biden-Harris administration used inflation as an excuse to double down on the very agenda that sparked it. Inflation concerns “underscore why it’s so important that we move forward” with the next installment of Bidenomics, Deese said in 2021.

That would become the perversely titled “Inflation Reduction Act,” another debt bomb designed to promote green energy. Goldman Sachs estimates that the IRA’s climate subsidies cost an additional $1.2 trillion, more than three times what its supporters claim.

To no one's surprise except the administration, the result of this spending was sustained inflation. Casey Mulligan at the Committee to Unlock Prosperity The administration's spending policies were found to account for about half of the inflation our economy has suffered. A better name for the bill would have been the Inflation Acceleration Act.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS REVIEWS

It’s no surprise that Harris is running away from the record of the past three and a half years. Democrats have abandoned the term “Bidenomics” as quickly as they abandoned the man. Instead, Harris speaks of an “opportunity economy.” Her supporters tout her approach as “fair capitalism” or “middle-class capitalism.”

But if one looks behind the curtain, it becomes clear that Harris has not learned from her mistakes in office. Instead, she is carrying forward the administration's belief that spending and government are the solution, not the problem.

Deese, who should have been sidelined after his plans sparked the worst inflation in 40 years, is back as a trusted adviser. Harris's plans bear his imprint, from $25,000 government checks for home buyers to a $6,000 payment for new parents.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

If the Biden-Harris administration had wanted to go beyond “Reaganomics,” it could hardly have done a more thorough job than the policies of the past three and a half years.

Harris can run from this record of spending and inflation, but it is her responsibility, no matter what she chooses to call it.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM SCOTT BESSENT

scroll to top