Bronta 'disappointed' by the ruling of the Supreme Court on the immigration raids of Los Angeles


The main official of the California Law has intervened the controversial decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on Monday on the application of immigration.

Atty General Rob Bronta condemned the decision, which clears the way for immigration agents to stop and question the people who suspect being in the United States illegally based only on information such as their perceived race or place of employment.

Speaking at a press conference on Monday in the center of Los Angeles, Bonta said he agreed with the claims that ACLU made in his lawsuit against the Trump administration. He called indiscriminate tactics used to make immigration arrests a violation of the 4th amendment, which forbids irrarhrazonable searches and seizures.

Bonta said he believes that it is unconstitutional “for ice agents, federal immigration officers, use the breed, the inability to speak English, location or occupation perceived to … stop and stop, search, take Californians.”

He also denounced what he described as the growing dependence of the Supreme Court in his emergency file, which he often darkens the decision making of the judges.

“It's disappointing,” he said. “And the emergency file has been used more and more. You often do not know who has voted and how there is no argument. There is no written opinion.”

Bonta called Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh “very disturbing.”

The justice designated by Trump argued that because many people who work daily in fields such as construction or agriculture, commitment to this work could be useful to help immigrant agents to determine which people stop.

Bonta said that the practice allows “the use of the breed to discriminate potentially”, saying “is disturbing and worrying.”

scroll to top