When Operai first presented the advanced chatgpt voice mode, I was intrigued by the idea that this could be the template for a voice assistant capable of all the Star Trek-style feats that Amazon and Google had promised a decade ago. A fluid round -trip conversation with an AI that did not seem to be talking to a trapped robot in 2014, capable of everything Chatgpt does, seemed ideal. It was an important reason why I kept paying $ 20 per month for Chatgpt Plus.
It is worth taking a time to appreciate what the advanced chatgpt voice can do, although imperfectly. You can engage in a real -time conversation with Chatgpt, one with the rhythm and even some of the emotions inherent to a human voice. You can interrupt the orientation in the middle of the AI, and will not forget what you were discussing. I mimic listening and human response behavior, even to the point of not waiting for you to speak; You can interrupt you back.
Operai recently decided to share Chatgpt's sound with a voice mode version that does not require a subscription rate. That raises an obvious question: if Chatgpt's voice mode is now free, is it worth paying for Chatgpt Plus? Now, before pressing the Cancel button, you must know that the free version is not identical to what payment users get. Operai has ensured that there is still an incentive to update.
First, the free level works with GPT-4O MINI, a smaller and slightly less powerful version of the GPT-4o Chatgpt model plus users who speak. That means that free level responses can be a little less nuanced and a little more generic. However, the biggest difference is the daily limit. Free users only get the voice mode for a limited time every day before they are cut, while more subscribers can continue chatting five times longer.
Another important benefit for users is more access to richer features, such as video and screen exchange within voice mode. While the free version is ideal for basic conversations, in addition to users they obtain a more immersive experience that allows Chatgpt to provide visual explanations, making it more useful for things such as problem solving, learning new skills or obtaining tutorials on complex issues.
Sound planning
I wanted to evaluate the differences between free and more chatgpt versions of the advanced voice mode. I performed three different tests to see how each one served: an informal conversation of multiple laps, a tongue twister challenge and a request for entertainment recommendations. These tests aimed to evaluate the response capacity, coherence and depth of the interaction of both versions.
For informal conversation, I began by saying: “Hi Chatgpt, how is your day?” Then I asked AI a hobby suggestion and asked him how to enter those hobbies. Both models of AI responded immediately and in an equally informal way. Each one offered a couple of ideas for hobbies, and both suggested photography as an option. The second suggestion of the free version was to paint, while in Chatgpt Plus, the other suggestion was to try something more active, such as hiking. Ask about how to start painting led to a somewhat generic list of painting supplies and the same for hiking team. Interestingly, they both had the same suggestion to obtain a camera if I wanted to try the photograph: the Eos Rebel T7 canon.
Then I decided to prove the listening capacity of the models with a Twister Classic Tongue saying: “Very well, Chatgpt, let's try your listening skills. Can you repeat this to me? Peter Piper picked up a peppers 'peppers' peppers. A peppers peppers peter peter peter peter.
For the final test, I chose something that involved a search and a trial. I asked about a movie to see and a restaurant to try in my city this weekend. Each one stopped for a couple of seconds before responding.
Both suggested to see the new Captain America film, although the free version offered the new Paddington Film as an alternative. The most suggested model MUFASA instead. However, they were perfectly synchronized to recommend the nearby AMC theater, and both pointed out the Hudson House restaurant in my city as the place to eat.
Pay for more
I talked with both models for one more time and noticed a lot of overlap, if not a direct repetition, among them. But, as I mentioned before, they soon told me that I had maximized my time with the free voice mode, while I spent almost twice as much time with the Plus version before choosing to stop, without indicating that I was close to reaching my time limit.
Both versions of the advanced voice of Chatgpt were useful, precise and equally good to imitate human discourse in the three tests. While the GPT-4 model is undoubtedly better and more powerful than GPT-4o Mini, you would have to be a true energy user to detect that.
If you are an informal user who wants to play with AI's voice chat for a few minutes every day, the free version is honestly great. It is soft, receptive and easy to use. You would really have to trust it a lot to make the voice mode the only reason to pay chatgpt plus. That said, there is much more in the subscription than only the best AI model for the voice.
I have written about many of the ways in which chatgpt employment, and Chatgpt Plus means that I have access to better models and additional characteristics for everything, planning ideas for dinner, entertaining children, maintaining my new year resolutions and performing many other tasks. That includes obtaining access to chatgpt tasks, which allows you to program missions in the future.
So is it worth paying? If you are only here for casual chats, maybe not. But if you are using chatgpt in other ways, those $ 20 per month still offer you a remarkably better experience. And if you have already been paying for Chatgpt Plus, I would say that the extent of the free voice mode is not a sufficient reason to cancel. Of course, if OpenAi doubles the price, I can reconsider.
