To the editor: Stanford’s stated intention to suspend rioters who invaded and vandalized administrative offices (including the president’s) is a refreshing approach for those trying to excuse their illegal conduct under the rubric of “free speech.”
Everyone has the right to express their opinions as long as they do not use their speech to incite criminal behavior. However, they do not have the right to invade property and vandalize it, which is what the students are accused of. Furthermore, when protesters engage in such behavior, they detract from their message.
Universities should support freedom of expression, but it would be helpful if there was a concomitant commitment to critical thinking and the expression of opinions that are truly informed by the facts. Encampments, storming of buildings, and vandalism should not be tolerated.
Those suspended students who have engaged in vandalism should be sued for restitution. Perhaps such consequences will encourage them in the future to carefully consider their behavior before joining a mafia.
Terry Shenkman, Culver City
