Many people online have been very, very upset by the The double conclusion of the Trump Department of JusticeHe announced last Sunday, that the death of Jeffrey Epstein in jail in 2019 was a suicide and that the Federal Research Office did not have “” incriminatory “clients' list” among his Epstein archives.
The tremendous uproar against the Department of Justice and the FBI has crossed partisan lines; In any case, there have been many conservative commentators and some republican elected officials who have expressed the greatest outragewith accusations and implications that the government is hiding something about the case to protect powerful people.
Given the sordid nature of the underlying theme and the fact that the federals closely examined “more than ten thousand videos downloaded and images of illegal material of child sexual abuse and other pornography”, the obsession with the “Epstein archives” issues an environment that is, frankly, something creepy. Without a doubt, it is always fair to seek justice for victims, but many do not want public scrutiny.
The management of the Trump administration of the Epstein archives has not been their best time. During a February interview at Fox NewsAtty General Pam Bondi said, in response to the question of the host John Roberts about whether the Department of Justice would launch a “customer list of Jeffrey Epstein”, that the list was “sitting [her] Desk right now to review. “It is an amazing approximately the face so that Bondi now rejects that researchers have such a list.
However, with that great warning, the fact remains: this is not the largest business in the world, and if you think it is, then you probably need to close the session on social networks.
The elections in the middle of the period of the next autumn will not be determined by the existence, or absence, of a “list of customers” for an extravagantly rich dead pedophile. Nor will they be decided for the absurd reasons of whether FBI Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino have somehow been “compromised.” (They have not done so.) On the other hand, the choice, and our policy, will be disputed for typical substantive reasons: economy, inflation, immigration, crime, global stability, etc. This is how it should be. There are simply better uses of his time than furious for the declared absence of the government of the list of very Ballyhoed clients.
You can, for example, consider spending more time, during these summer weeks, with your family. Maybe you can take children camping or fishing. Maybe you can take them to a amusement park or one of the many treasures of the United States National Park. You can spend less time by moving Instagram and Tiktok and more time reading a good outdated book; You will learn more, it will be happier and will be considerably less likely that traffic in marginal problems and a strange rhetoric that alienates much more than it unifies.
Instead of finding meaning in confirmation biases and group thinking validations of social networks algorithms, it may be able to locate the meaning where innumerable human beings have found it since time immemorial: religion. Spend more time praying, reading the scriptures and attending services in their preferred worship. All these uses of your time will fill it with a sensation of stability, meaning and purpose that you will never find in the intestine of an X thread in the Epstein files.
Too many people today who are deeply involved in the combustible political process of the United States have forgotten that there are more important things in life than politics. And even within the specific scope of politics, there are many things that deserve attention and emotional investment than others. Above all, they are conservatives, those oriented towards sobriety and humility, not utopism and decay, which should be able to properly contextualize the unknown strip and loosen of the United States within our broader lives and that they should be able to concentrate on significant political problems with the exclusion of Tawdry's soap opera drama.
Like many others, I hope that the recent one, and apparently definitive, that agitates the Saga of Epstein's archives, does not really prove to be the last word on the matter. To the limited extent that it allows me to think about this secondary show, I hope that the Administration directly addresses the many legitimate and unanswered questions that now a frustrated citizenship is made that has apparently been deceived by the Trump administration, either in the February statement of Bondi or in this month's report. But I also hope that the extent of the anger of this last week can serve as an edifying moment. Let's go back to the real things of life and focus on what matters most.
Josh Hammer's last book is “Israel and civilization: the fate of the Jewish nation and the destiny of the West. ” This article was produced in collaboration with the creators Syndicate. @Josh_hammer
Perspectives
Times Insights It offers an analysis generated by the voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear in any news article.
point of view
Perspective
The following content generated by AI works perplexed. Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
- The article states that the conclusion of the Trump Department of Justice about the death of Jeffrey Epstein is a suicide and the absence of a “client list” is not as politically explosive as the online speech suggests, urging readers to prioritize substantive issues such as economy, immigration and crime in the next elections.
- He criticizes the management of Epstein archives administration, pointing out the previous claim of Attorney General Pam Bondi to possess a list of clients as an “amazing approximately the face” that requires public clarification.
- The author rules out the fixation of conspiracies related to Epstein as “spooky” and counterproductive, advising readers to invest time in family members, outdoor activities and religious practices instead of indignation in social networks.
- Although it recognizes the legitimate public frustration, the piece emphasizes that the mid -period elections will depend on traditional policies, not the “secondary show” of Epstein, and demands conservatives to maintain the focus on “sobriety and humility” in political participation.
Different views on the subject
- Critics argue that the reversal of the Department of Justice on the evidence of Epstein feeds the distrust, with the bipartisan outrage that questions whether the powerful figures are protected from responsibility, as highlighted in the reports of the article.[2].
- The theories of conspiracy, with the presentation, the now officials of the FBI Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, Insist Epstein, was killed to hide a “client list” that involves the elites, despite the official findings of suicide and no evidence of blackmail[2][3].
- The skeptics demand transparency, citing the Fox News interview of Fox de Bondi, where he said that a list of clients was “on his desk”, contrasting sharply with the July note of the Department of Justice that indicates that there is no such list[1][4].
- The refusal of the Department of Justice to launch additional Epstein files, which cites the material of child abuse and the protection of innocent individuals, feeds the accusations of a cover -up, particularly among conservative circles[2][4].
