Last November, Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris among young men aged 18 to 29, accumulating 56% of their votes According to Associated Press. That represents a great decrease in 2008, the climax of the coalition of Barack Obama, when the Democratic candidate won 62% of the young male vote against the challenger of the Republican Party John McCain.
Clearly, the Democrats have a young man problem, and have promised to do something about it. Consequently, the party is Spend $ 20 million In a special effort of several years called Speaking With American Men: A Strategic Plan. The project, The New York Times Recently reported“It will study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces.”
Yes, really. Keep your laugh.
It is true that the main democratic figures could use some help on the fronts of “syntax” and “language”. They could start correcting the ship, at that score, abandoning the well -known Gobbledygok glasses from Joe Biden and the infamous “relieved what has been” Harris. But the rubber will fulfill the way for the Democrats when it comes to the third critical and elusive category of concern for its new effort of young male dissemination: the content.
Paraphrasing a venerable saying, one can put lipstick in a pig, but the pig, at the end of the day, remains a pig. And something big has to change for the Democrats. Neither is your problem limited to young men; The general favorability qualifications of the party, in recent months, have Minimum records of registration In public surveys.
Here, the Democrats are some unre requested tips on the steps they could consider to become less catastrophicly unpopular with young men, and many other Americans as well.
On the subject of sexuality and the human person, I could consider starting their efforts to disseminate young people from designating to properly define what exactly a man is and, by extension, a woman. In fact, your group Most recent nominated from the Supreme Court He fought publicly to solve this mystery. It is probably better, before trying to design pro-young-man policies, to familiarize yourself with your target audience. The definition of “man” as it has existed since the garden of Eden is a rather good place to begin.
After successfully defining “man” and “woman”, I could consider not to consent to recurrent complaints collected against the so -called toxic masculinity. In general, it is a good idea, in the political scope, not retaining Dripping desdire to the demographic group he is trying to reach. Of course, men have been killing since Cain killed Abel, but many of them have also been doing some quite good things for humanity from just around that same period of time. A key to publicly rejecting Misandry will be to abandon support for diversity, equity and inclusion, which, together with also Now being illegalTake a quite dim sight of men.
On the issue of immigration, I could consider not opening the borders of the United States to, well, practically everyone, but especially young men in search of economic opportunities. It is possible that the Democrats have not received this impression of their sources in the Harvard Faculty Hall, but now more than half of the Americans LIVE PAYMENT CHECK TO THE PAYMENT CHECK. Too many young men struggle to keep their families; In fact, many delay marriage first due to finance. Filling the area with more salary competition can please the Wokerati, but it will not help you recover credibility with US support.
On the issue of environmentalism, I could not so remarkably sacrifice American energy in the altar of climate alarmism. The young male voter simply wants a fair opportunity to make a living and provide security and security to his family. The restriction of the extraction of hydrocarbons with the hands in the ham more than anything else increases the price of each good or service.
You might think that Trump's tariffs are a threat to prices stability, but You would be wrong – At least until now. The true threat to the fiscal welfare of the American median comes from the price of energy, from which all other prices flow. Maybe, just maybe, do not sacrifice all that in favor of Mother Earth?
The good news for the Democrats is that there is a great potential advantage of their efforts to reach young men. The bad news for the Democrats is the same: there is much to win precisely due to the unpopular ones that are currently with that cohort.
Josh Hammer's last book is “Israel and civilization: the fate of the Jewish nation and the destiny of the West. ” This article was produced in collaboration with the creators Syndicate. @Josh_hammer
