To the editor: The year was 2004. California had already passed net metering laws to encourage residents and businesses to install rooftop solar. I bit and spent tens of thousands of dollars on a system. My electric bill went to zero and I was happy. (“Regulators approve sweeping change in how most Californians are billed for electricity,” May 9)
Southern California Edison and other private utilities were not. So they got to work and played the long game.
They convinced the California Public Utilities Commission to eliminate net metering, so they wouldn't have to reimburse me at market rates for the excess electricity I put into the grid. They also got the CPUC to add a $10 grid connection fee.
Governors and the Legislature have been complicit in this slow-motion bait and switch, because utility lobbyists know how to do their job well. Of course consumers are angry.
Governor Gavin Newsom, drive around and look at the rooftops. You'll see a lot of solar panels up there. Each of them represents a vote that you will not get if you have presidential aspirations.
And Edison, when battery technology gets to the point where you can disconnect me from the grid, you will be required to disconnect me from your system, at your expense.
Jon Rowe, Costa Mesa
..
To the editor: As someone who chooses to live in a small apartment and get around by walking or cycling, I have a lifestyle that is already more climate friendly than those who live in large houses and drive electric cars.
Why, then, am I punished with a higher electric bill, with the addition of a $24 monthly charge, just so that the most profligate among us can have a lower bill?
I don't understand why state regulators would approve something that clearly makes life more difficult for the people who cause the least climate impact.
Justin Johnson, Redondo Beach
..
To the editor: After reading the entire article about the anger over the new flat monthly rate, I firmly believe we should kick the scoundrels out of Sacramento the next time an election comes up.
It is obvious that Newsom, most legislators, and CPUC commissioners serve the interests of the utilities, not us.
Watana Charoenrath, Agoura Hills
